Very often people want to know what the purpose of something is.So when Faustus wakes from his scholastic slumber to discover that all his bookish wisdom is but nothing if not able to transform reality he, in that moment, becomes a pragmatist about knowledge. This epiphany has, naturally, dire consequences for him. Why, one wonders. And we wonder thus because maybe we are innately conditioned to think that real value can only be defined as the sort of value an object, action or person has in and for itself; as opposed to when we think of things as valuable in relation to their function. This is when we are corrupting what value essentially is.
However, Faustus, despite his intelligence and education, becomes obsessessed with the thought of using his wisdom for a greater (not as in divine but rather as in more effective) end. This is the first indication of his slide into evil. Just that sentiment in itself.
The fact that he then makes a deal with the devil, unlimited power in exchange for his soul, to put into action his scholastic knowledge is only the second move towards his demise. The third being, naturally, his lust for Helen of Troy, whom he conjures up in response to a sort of 'dare'. He was, after all, just a man. And maybe Marlowe is clever here. Is not Faustus' love for Helen what ingratiates him to us, in the end? Is this not why we cringe to think of him burning for an eternity in hell?
So, when Faustus asks for and then insists that he becomes supremely effective in the base world of ordinary man, he steps out of the virtue of the ivory tower into the moral quagmire of a more visceral reality. Ah, the ancient Greek duality lives on, dear Reader! But Faustus learns to take risks, he falls in love and he destroys himself in the end.
So when, if ever, dear Reader, is power illicit?
2 comments:
Gorgeous. The enigma of pure scientific research 9though I am cynical as to the questioon wghthere there is such a thing as a pure scientist). If it is virtuous to seek knowledge for knowledge's seek, what responsibility does the scientist who develops sarin gas or nuclear fission have? Does the responsibility lie only with practical mem who put such inventions to use?
Corrected version of the comment
Gorgeous. The enigma of pure scientific research (though I am cynical as to the question whether there is such a thing as a pure scientist and hence pure science). If it is virtuous to seek knowledge for knowledge's seek, what responsibility does the scientist who develops sarin gas or nuclear fission have? Does the responsibility lie only with practical men who put such inventions to use?
Post a Comment